Sometimes I’m both amused and disgruntled when I see food packaging that spouts how “good for you” it is. There’s a whole spectrum of jargon used on packaging to try and get you to buy whatever it is they’re selling: “fat free”, “only 100 calories per serving”, “12 vitamins and minerals”, “no trans fat” and the list goes on.
Most any food has some attribute that can be spun in a
positive manner. And while some products may actually be fairly healthy for you, the ones that make me
internally groan are the ones that are obviously not so healthy but somehow they want to be on the healthy
bandwagon. It doesn’t take a genius to realize that this sugar-laden cereal or
that buttery cracker isn’t particularly healthy (despite any starbursts of
exciting “health” related information to the contrary). [Pause.] It just feels so
disingenuous.
From a designer’s point of view I can see where companies are
coming from; they’re trying to compete with other companies spouting the same
rhetoric as well as actual healthy
foods. They’re trying to draw people into buying their product that isn’t quite
as “bad” as it could be (since it’s “only 100 calories” or it’s “fat free”) as
to help lessen any guilt about eating their product. (Sure an apple would
probably be a healthier option, but an apple doesn’t have any chocolate in it,
does it?)
As a consumer I find it rather ridiculous. All you need is a
little common sense to look at something and know that it’s just empty calories
and has little nutritional value. Don’t get me wrong I’m not opposed to indulging
in junk food from time to time. I enjoy potato chips and chocolates and ice
cream, but I’d like for food packaging to be more honest about what they’re selling. If you’re selling junk food, own
it—be junk food. Don’t try to pass
yourself off as some sort of healthy option when we both know how little truth
there is to that facade.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.